| |
|
ON THE BURDEN OF INTERNATIONAL DEBT
A Pastoral Letter of The Catholic Bishops of Kenya
|
May 17, 2005
"Do not charge interest on a loan but fear your god and let
your brethren live with you" (Lev 25:36)
1. Introduction
We, the Catholic Bishops of Kenya, wish to share our concern with
the Christians and all the people of good will in our land. In the
next months, many international happenings are scheduled around
the world. These meetings will deal with important matters regarding
our country, our continent -Africa- and all the developing countries
in the world. In July, the most powerful countries, the so-called
G8, will meet in Edinburgh, Great Britain, and they will discuss
the status of the international debt and programs to reduce poverty
in the South of the world. In September, the United Nations (UN)
will organize the Millennium Assembly to discuss how to implement
programs that will enable humanity to attain the Millennium Goals,
among them, the reduction of global poverty and the development
of a just world. Next December, the World Trade Organization (WTO)
will convene in Hong Kong for a new round of talks, to decide on
important regulation regarding international trade. We cannot forget
that earlier this year the World Social Forum met in Brazil and
that trade ministers from around the world met here in Kenya, in
Mombasa, last March, to prepare the WTO meeting of next December.
Thus our country is not only interested in these happenings. Kenya
is part and parcel of the process that could lead to a better world.
We would like to share with you a few reflections on the role each
one can play to alleviate poverty and build a just society.
2. Origin of International Debt
Before looking at our present situation, we need to go back in time
and understand why and how Kenya, like many other African countries,
is deeply indebted to the rich countries in the world. At the end
of World War II, the United States of America devised the Marshall
Plan. This plan foresaw donations and long-term loans to European
countries to finances their reconstruction and enable them to modernise
their industry. The Europeans were able to make good use of these
incentives and, in a short time, they became the privileged trading
partners of the United States. The latter, afraid that the financial
surplus thus created could lead to inflation, encouraged investment
in American companies abroad. By the early 1960s, European banks
were flooded with American dollars. At the same time, most African
countries were attaining their independence and needed funding to
allow their economies to grow and improve infrastructure. International
banks started to lend money at very low rates. Later, soon after
the energy crisis of 1973, governments of Northern countries, faced
with recession and mass unemployment at home, decided to endow States
in the South with credit power regulated by bilateral agreements.
In other words, a country in the rich North would allow a country
in the South to buy goods and services from their industry and pay
later on. In this way, employment and production were given a lease
of life in exchange of later payment from third countries. Loans
provided by the World Bank to finance development projects are a
third source of debt. Most of these loans were underwritten in the
1960s; they still weigh heavily on the economies of the South of
the world.
3. Africa: a Continent in Debt
Today, all developing countries in the World -Kenya included- have
huge debts to repay. They owe money to private companies, usually
international banks, to Governments, and to international institutions
like the World Bank and International Monetary Fund. By the end
of 2004, external debt of Sub-Saharan countries stood at US$ 231
billion. At the same time, the Gross Domestic Product of these countries
was just about US$350 billion. In other words, African countries
cannot pay back their debts and sustain development. Most countries
have to spend more than twenty percent of their revenues to service
the debt, i.e., to pay annual quotas of debt and the interests generated
so far. The debt has helped the recovery and growth of rich countries,
but denied the development of poor countries. This situation goes
hand in hand with other causes of stagnation and poverty. The G8
countries (Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan Russian, United
Kingdom, and the United States of America) keep asking the South
to be opened to free trade. They ask this while, at home, they heavily
subsidize their industrial and agricultural sectors. How can Africa
farmers compete with rich farmers in the North who receive government
support and are so able to sell their produce under cost? There
are also local causes to the growing unbalance in world development
and poverty. In the past, funding provided by aid and loans was
often skimmed by corrupt officials, misused in wrong investments,
or directed to purposes different that those for what they were
provided. Corruption on the part of our government officials and
the lack of good governance are as much responsible of today's poverty
as external causes. We cannot denounces the evil of foreign debt
without accepting our responsibility for the growth of poverty among
us.
4. God Speaks to Us
In our attempt to understand and present in its proper light the
issue of debt cancellation we need to turn to the Word of God. We
would like to focus the attention of all on the parable of the rich
man and Lazarus, found in the Gospel of Luke (16:19-31). The rich
man can easily be seen as representing the North, while poor Lazarus
the underdeveloped South. The rich man ignores Lazarus' plight.
For this attitude of his, his name has not been recorded while all
know the name of the poor man: Lazarus. Ignoring the situation of
other people, or worse, not caring about what our actions may cause
in other people's lives, leads to loss of true human identity: our
names will not be remembered. The efforts at debts cancellation
that were made till now could be compared to the scraps that Lazarus
hoped he could feed on at the rich man's table: they are illusory
promises without real substances. Lazarus still died of hunger and
disease! Besides, eating scraps of food that fall from a table is
not in line with the dignity of human beings: it is fitting for
pets! Giving to others scraps rather than what they deserve means
basically treating them in a sub-human way, not as human beings!
The Word of God speaks frequently debt and cancellation of debt.
In the book of Leviticus, God calls on the people to forgive all
debts every fifty years. It is the jubilee of the Lord (Lv 25:1-22;
see also Dt 15:1-2). Even when asking for collateral, one must not
oppress the poor "No one shall take a hand mill or even its
upper stone as a pledge for debt, for he would be taking the debtor's
sustenance as a pledge" (Dt 24:6) As those responsible for
the teaching office in the Church, we have the duty to alert all
that the time to work on justice and equality issues is right now,
in this life. In the fullness of he Kingdom of God, the roles of
power will be reversed: the oppressed will rejoice and the oppressors
will suffer. Far from being an invitation to passive acquiescence
to the status quo, these remarks remind all that waiting for the
future life to make amends will be too late. The right time is now.
The Scriptures and the Christian way of life are so clear that all
believers should be able to adhere to them. Those who choose otherwise
are excluded from the communion and the joy of all God's children:
not even something of an extraordinary nature would make them back
to their senses.
Like some other parables, the one regarding the rich man and Lazarus
is not finished: what will happen in the end, what kind of stand
will be taken depends on each individual. Opening one's eyes on
the poor man's plight is possible for all generations and so it
is for the present one. The invitation that we launch to all is
clear: let us learn to listen and see! In this situation we would
like to echo the words of the Holy Father in his Post-Synodal Apostolic
Exhortation Ecclesia in Africa. The role of the Church is that of
the Good Samaritan not only for the peoples and nations of Africa
(EA 41), but also for those belonging to the affluent North on this
particular issue. Being warned about the unwillingness to cancel
unjust debts means to be given a chance not to end up like the rich
man of the parable, who opened his eyes all too late. At the same
time, we convinced and we desire to proclaim once more that God's
mercy is for all, since he has written our names on the palms of
his hands (cf. Is49:15-16; EA 143). As God's children we are all
invited together to solve the problems of this earth, without discriminating
between rich and poor, but making sure that all move together in
the same direction.
5. Kenya: Struggling for Change
It is our responsibility as shepherds to realize and help our flocks
to understand that the external debt is evil. However the Kenyan
debt was contracted, today it is the cause of oppression, of poverty,
we dare say of neo-modern slavery. Kenya has been the recipient
of a cumulative total of 17 billion US$ in loans and aid; this equals
to 1,275 billion shillings, or an average of 40,000 Kenya shillings
per each citizen. In spite of his huge amount of money, Kenya has
witnessed a progressive decline of its economy. Today, the vast
majority of Kenyans live below the poverty line, while a small minority
enjoys a life style higher than that of developed countries. Debt
servicing is hampering our struggle for development and social justice.
We should remember that the official poverty line is placed at earning
less than US$ 1 per day per person. We all know that this limit
is in itself a masquerade. No person can be expected to live with
less than 80 [Kenya] shillings per day, especially in our urban
areas where the cost of life is no lower than that of many European
or North American countries. To pay people according to the salary
structures applying to most of our workers is tantamount to exploit
their work in the pretence of legality.
We should also underline that much of the aid we receive from donor
countries is not a donation toward development. More often than
not, it is a loan that must be repaid and adds up to the already
huge debt our country has towards the rich nations of the North.
In his message for the World Day of Peace 2005, His Holiness John
Paul II told us that, "The tragedy of poverty remains closely
linked to the issues of the foreign debt of poor countries. Poor
countries remain trapped in a vicious circle: low income and weak
growth limit savings and, in turn, weak investments and an inefficient
use of savings do not favour growth". "This need is clearly
seen when we consider the many difficult problems standing in the
way of development in Africa: numerous armed conflicts, pandemic
diseases aggravated by extreme poverty, and political instability
leading to widespread insecurity. These are tragic situations which
call for a radically new direction for Africa: there is a need to
create new forms of solidarity, at bilateral and multilateral levels,
through a more decisive commitment on the part of all, with complete
conviction that the well-being of the people of Africa is an indispensable
condition for the attainment of the universal common good".
(Message for the World Day of Peace 2005, #8 and 10)
6. Is it Just to Call for Debt Cancellation?
Debt becomes an ethical issue when it poses a major obstacle to
the full enjoyment of human rights. In as far as debt servicing
reduces people to poverty while its creditors determine Kenya's
political, economic and social destiny, then debt is essentially
a human rights issue and a moral concern for a Christian. We have
to ask ourselves: why should the poor in our country, who have nothing
to say about accruing the debt and have received little or no benefit
from it, have to bear the greater burden of its payment? The grand
total of Kenya's public debt is, in our view, unsustainable in as
far as the country is left with insufficient funds to meet its human
rights obligations, especially in relation to the Millennium Development
Goals. We reject the narrow criteria used in the international Monetary
Fund Debt Sustainability Analysis Framework. This approach only
compares external debt to exports and does not seem to include domestic
debt as part of a country's financial predicament. Yet, Kenya's
internal debt is considerable - accounting for 45 per cent of the
country's total outstanding debt -and it is foreign debt-related:
we interpret it as our government' attempt to cover the gap in its
balance of payments created by foreign debt servicing.
Poor management of the resources and especially those related to
the public debt has been accompanied with chronic corruption in
our country. In 1999, we analysed what we then termed: 'the paradox
of Kenya's unrealised economic potential'. (Kenyan Bishops, 1999
'The Economy of Kenya' in AMECEA Documentation Service, ADS 11-12/1999
No. 502, 1st July 1999 Nairobi: AMECEA). We persistently continue
to call on our governments to establish democratic structuresand
just policies in order to deal with famine, wages, working conditions,
exploitation, conflict and insecurity. We remind our political leaders
in particular that to deny Kenyans a new constitution indirectly
amounts to denying their fellow-citizens their right to life. As
far as Kenya's debt is concerned, it is estimated that 90 per cent
of all the items included in the Public Debt Hedge Book could be
illegitimate, odious and fraudulent (Obonyo, R.O., 2005 The Cripping
Debt Burden, Research on Kenya's Current Debt Situation, Paper Presented
by Pro. Obonyo - University of Nairobi to the Kenya Debt Relief
Network -KENDREN, Unpublished. If odious, a country is not obliged
to pay the debt under international law). If true, Kenya is not
obliged to pay this kind of debt under international law.
At the same time, we reject the notion that the poor economy is
solely the result of poor governance and rent-seeking. Even if all
Kenyans were hardworking people, living together peacefully and
governed by virtuous leaders, they would still be poor because of
debt service payments. We believe Hon David Mwiraria, Minister for
Finance, when he stated in his budget speech 2003/2004 that the
debt service continued to squeeze essential expenditures out of
the budget. Debt servicing was Kenya's single largest budgetary
item in the budget 2003/2004 accounting for 32 per cent of the entire
budget -more than the country spent on education and health combined.
This kind of debt is a matter of contractual or commutative justice:
a legally enforceable contract is not necessarily a morally just
one. To be just an agreement must also ensure social cohesion, peacefully
co-existence between nations, and their common development (Pontifical
Council "Cor Unum", 1999 World Hunger a challenge for
all: Development and Solidarity, #26). Whereas austerity measures
geared towards debt servicing put the heaviest human cost on our
poor and failed to turn Kenya into a paradise, banks in high-income
countries have seen their outstanding Third World loans drop. For
them the IMF did a good job. These banks have further taken adequate
measures to absorb losses that might result form default on the
part of any single large debtor. Here we say that the burden of
the debt crisis must be shared by all. Commercial banks, though
not Kenya's main creditors, can no longer be permitted to pass on
their losses to Kenya taxpayers.
Visible damage has already been done. Together with all the bishops
of Africa and Madagascar we see a clear link between the HIV/AIDS
pandemic and poverty (Symposium of Episcopal Conference of Africa
and Madagascar -SECAM, 2003, The Church in Africa in Face of the
HIV/AIDS Pandemic, 'Our Prayer is Always Full of Hope", Message
issued by SECAM, 7th October 2003, Dakar). It is also no coincidence
to hear the Holy Father speak about the Africa debt on a World Day
of Peace. Obviously, this vicious circle of debt, poverty, disease
and conflict in Africa needs to be broken. We applaud the willingness
of the International Financial Institutions and some G8 countries
to take new measures to cancel Africa's debt erodes the international
common good. On the other hand, we realise that the cancellation
of debts will not transform by itself the historical/ factorial/
structural inequalities between the nations of the world. The outcome
of a sports contest between a world-champion and a beginner is predictable
even if the rules of the game are fair and equally applied. The
failure to bring about international social justice is not just
a technical or political mistake; it is a failure of solidarity
(John Paul II, On Social Concern -Sollicitudo Rei Socialis -Washington,
D.C: United States Catholic Conference, 1986, no. 23). Moreover,
mechanism should be put in place to monitor our governance's spending
and encourage accountability and transparency. We will also have
to work towards a clear shared vision on development in our country.
7. What We Want to See Happening
We expect the Governments of creditor countries to implement the
total cancellation of the debt owed by Kenya, relax restrictive
monetary policies and encourage imports from the developing world;
when pursuing macroeconomic strategies to keep in mind that the
ability to repay debts and attract private investor capital is co-determined
by the level of global and domestic interest rates;
We remind the industrialised countries of their promise to spend
0.7 per cent of their GDP on Official Development Aid;
We expect the international Financial Institutions to provide sufficient
financial liquidity and policy flexibility so that Kenya can make
the necessary adjustments without further sacrificing growth and
equity;
We expect commercial banks, in the high-income countries to apply
principles that protect basic human rights in the least developed
countries;
We expect the National and International Banks to favour the poor
and be pro-development in their business transactions, not just
profit oriented;
We encourage the Government of Kenya to cooperate with interested
parties toward the cancellation of its external public debt;
We expect the Government of Kenya to provide leadership and let
out nation's standing in the world be based upon transparency, accountability
and genuine concern for the poorest; 'lack of capacity' can be no
excuse for a government's allowing others to determine the destiny
of our nation;
We request the government to do whatever is possible and drastically
reduce the domestic debt. We call on the people of Kenya to ensure
that proper monitoring will be in place and facilitate a transparent
use of development funds.
We demand that all those people, most so the Kenya citizens who
have siphoned some government funds and are now hiding them is some
personal accounts abroad to return it back with apologies to the
nation.
We call on all people of goodwill to help restructure the entire
international trading and financial system. We ask them in particular
to help create a fair and transparent arbitration process framework.
After doing all what is humanly possible, we must turn in trust
to our Lord and Saviour to bless Kenya and its peoples.
Signed by all catholic Bishops of Kenya:
1. Rt. Rev Cornelius Arap Korir - Bishop of Eldoret/Chairman, Kenya
Episcopal Conference
2. Rt Rev Peter Kairo - Bishop of Nakuru/Vice Chairman, Kenya Episcopal
Conference
3. Most Rev. R.S Ndingi Mwana a Nzeki - Archbishop of Nairobi
4. Most Rev John Njenga - Archbishop of Mombasa
5. Most Rev Zacchaes Okoth - Archbishop of Kisumu
6. Most Rev Nicodemus Kirima - Archbishop of Nyeri
7. Most Rev John Njue - Coadjutor Archbishop of Nyeri
8. Rt. Rev Philip Sulumeti - Bishop of Kakamega
9. Rt. Rev. Ambrose Ravasi - Bishop of Marsabit
10. Rt. Rev Paul Darmanin - Bishop of Garissa
11. Rt. Rev. Joseph Mairura Okemwa - Bishop of Kisii
12. Rt Rev. Boniface Lele - Bishop of Kitui
13. Rt. Rev Philip Anyolo - Bishop of Homa Bay
14. Rt. Rev Luigi Locati - Bishop of Isiolo Vicariate
15. Rt Rev. Alfred Rotich - Bishop of Military Ordinariate
16. Rt. Rev. Maurice Crowley - Bishop of Kitale
17. Rt Rev. Norman King'oo Wambua - Bishop of Bungoma
18. Rt Rev. Peter Kihara Kariuki, IMC - Bishop of Murang'a
19. Rt Rev. David Kamau Ng'ang'a - Auxiliary Bishop of Nairobi
20. Rt Rev. Anthony Mukobo, IMC - Auxiliary Bishop of Nairobi
21. Rt Rev. Patrick Harrington - Bishop of Lodwar
22. Rt. Rev. Francis Baldacchino - Bishop of Malindi
23. Rt Rev. Virgilio Pante IMC - Bishop of Maralal
24. Rt Rev. Salesius Mugambi - Bishop of Meru
25. Rt Rev. Cornelius Schilder - Bishop of Ngong
26. Rt Rev. Luigi Paiaro - Bishop of Nyahururu
27. Rt Rev. Emmanuel Okombo - Bishop of Kericho
28. Rt Rev. Martin Kivuva Musonde - Bishop of Machakos
29. Rt Rev. Anthony Muheria - Bishop of Embu
May 17, 2005 |