In 1991 the World Health Organisation set itself
a goal to reduce the number of active cases in treatment by at least
1 to 10,000 in the hope that this would have an impact on the risk
of transmission of leprosy. The date set was 2002 and in many countries
it was reached.
Usually initiatives start from health personnel and associations
working in the sectors and they aim to increase awareness with regard
to the causes of the disease and its effects, including social affects.
The most important challenge in future is to ensure the cases of
leprosy are diagnosed in time. In many cases there is talk of integrating
anti-leprosy programmes in basic health care systems. On the one
hand wars limit the covering of services and on the other restrictions
imposed by international situations reduce resources for health
and educational services. Moreover funds for health care are destined
exclusively to hospitals in capitals and not to basic health care
in rural areas. National health care policies based on paid services
threaten to exclude the poor, including leprosy sufferers. The difficulties
of disabled persons including three million people with disabilities
caused by leprosy are ignored.
To guarantee services, diagnosis, care of leprosy patients valorising
basic health care services will therefore be the most suitable system
to respond to the health needs of the people in the south of the
world.,
Leprosy in 2002.
Africa
In Africa in 2002 the number of cases diagnosed was 48.248 :
| Comores |
4.04 |
| Madagascar: |
3.34 |
| Angola: |
3.21 |
| Mozambique: |
2.91 |
| Tanzania: |
1.90 |
| Liberia: |
1.68 |
| Guinea
Conakry: |
1.63 |
| Sierra
Leona: |
1.51 |
| Republic
of Congo: |
1.20 |
| Niger: |
1.09 |
Besides
these countries where the diagnosis rate is higher than 1 per 10,000,
there are other countries Nigeria, Congo, Cameroon, Ivory Coast
and Ghana where the diagnosis rate is less than 1 per 10,000, but
the annual number cases is higher than 1,000.
In 2002, WHO received no information with regard to leprosy cases
from Botswana, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Ethiopia, Kenya, Malawi, Mauritania,
Namibia, Togo, Zambia and Zimbabwe. We know that in some countries,
Ethiopia for example, register numerous new cases of leprosy. This
means the available figures are not complete.
In Guinea Bissau, Liberia, Sierra Leone, Congo, because of war information
supplied is incomplete.
America
In 2002 the total number of diagnosed cases of leprosy was 39.939.
Only Brazil has a diagnosis rate higher than 1 per 10.000:
| Brazil:
|
2.23 |
| Guyana:
|
0.44 |
| Trinidad: |
0.26 |
| Dominican
Republic: |
0.24 |
| Colombia:
|
0.14 |
Like in
Africa, in a number of American countries there are new cases of
leprosy and ant-leprosy programmes do not function. WHO receives
no information with regard to leprosy from Bolivia, Costa Rica,
Cuba, Ecuador, El Salvador, Guatemala, Haiti, Uruguay e Venezuela.
Middle East
It should be said that for the World Health Organisation Somalia
and Sudan are part of the Middle East
Total number of cases diagnosed in 2002 was 4.665.
Rates of diagnosis are below 1 per 10.000.
| Sudán: |
0.45 |
| Yemén: |
0.21 |
| Egypt: |
0.19 |
| Somalia: |
0.14 |
| Qatar: |
0.11 |
Pakistan,
also considered a Middle East by WHO, registers more than 1,000
new cases of leprosy every year. In Iraq, Somalia Sudan war prevents
the functioning of anti-leprosy programmes and information is partial.
South East Asia
This region has the highest number of cases
| Nepal: |
5.65 |
| India: |
4.60 |
| East
Timor |
3.13 |
| Myanmar: |
1.60 |
| Sri
Lanka: |
1.16 |
All the
countries in this region register new cases. Countries with more
than 1,000 new cases are Indonesia, Bangladesh and Thailand. India
registers the highest number of cases in the world
.
The total number of cases diagnosed in 2002 in South East Asia was
520.632
A drop of about 100.000 new cases in India in 2002 affected the
world figures. When India’s national anti-leprosy programme
was extended to the north of the country figures show stable transmission
of leprosy in the region after a big increase in new cases between
1997 and 2001
.
Far East and Pacific
Some Pacific Islands’ high diagnosis rate of new cases is
because their population is scarce.
In 2002 countries with the most serious situation:
| Micronesia: |
8.93 |
| Marshall
Islands: |
7.88 |
| Papua
New Guinea: |
1.12 |
| Samoa: |
0.66 |
| Cambodia: |
0.65 |
Philippines,
Vietnam and China register more than 1.000 new cases annually.
In the Far East and the Pacific in 2002 the total number of new
cases diagnosed was 7.154.
This shows a gradual decrease. Some Pacific islands have experimented
with rigorous anti-leprosy programmes in recent years including
vaccination of all residents. Moreover in recent decades many islands
have improved the standards of living. These factors have probably
had an impact on the transmission of the disease.
Europe
WHO reports 34 cases
Global situation in 2003, in 110 countries not to be compared:
| Region |
Cases
in treated with drugs registered 31.12.2002 |
New
cases reported in 2002 independent of registration |
| Africa
|
53.888
|
48.248
|
| América
|
75.686
|
39.939
|
| East
Mediterráneo |
7.899
|
4.665
|
| South
East Asia |
385.458
|
520.632
|
| West
Pacífic |
11.335
|
7.154
|
| Europa
|
45
|
34
|
| World |
534.311
|
620.672
|
|
(Info:
dott. Sunil Deepak direttore del dipartimento medico-scientifico
dell’Aifo e Presidente dell’Ilep, la Federazione Internazionale
delle Associazioni anti-Lebbra)
(Agencia Fides)
|