| DO NOT BE
OVERCOME BY EVIL BUT OVERCOME EVIL WITH GOOD
1. At the beginning of the New Year, I once again address the leaders
of nations and all men and women of good will, who recognize the
need to build peace in the world. For the theme of this 2005 World
Day of Peace I have chosen Saint Paul's words in the Letter to the
Romans: "Do not be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with
good" (12:21). Evil is never defeated by evil; once that road
is taken, rather than defeating evil, one will instead be defeated
by evil.
The great Apostle brings out a fundamental truth: peace is the
outcome of a long and demanding battle which is only won when evil
is defeated by good. If we consider the tragic scenario of violent
fratricidal conflicts in different parts of the world, and the untold
sufferings and injustices to which they have given rise, the only
truly constructive choice is, as Saint Paul proposes, to flee what
is evil and hold fast to what is good (cf. Rom 12:9).
Peace is a good to be promoted with good: it is a good for individuals,
for families, for nations and for all humanity; yet it is one which
needs to be maintained and fostered by decisions and actions inspired
by good. We can appreciate the profound truth of another saying
of Saint Paul: "Repay no one evil for evil" (Rom 12:17).
The one way out of the vicious circle of requiting evil for evil
is to accept the Apostle's words: "Do not be overcome by evil,
but overcome evil with good" (Rom 12:21).
Evil, good and love
2. From the beginning, humanity has known the tragedy of evil and
has struggled to grasp its roots and to explain its causes. Evil
is not some impersonal, deterministic force at work in the world.
It is the result of human freedom. Freedom, which distinguishes
human beings from every other creature on earth, is ever present
at the heart of the drama of evil. Evil always has a name and a
face: the name and face of those men and women who freely choose
it. Sacred Scripture teaches that at the dawn of history Adam and
Eve rebelled against God, and Abel was killed by Cain, his brother
(cf. Gen 3-4). These were the first wrong choices, which were succeeded
by countless others down the centuries. Each of these choices has
an intrinsic moral dimension, involving specific individual responsibilities
and the fundamental relationship of each person with God, with others
and with all of creation.
At its deepest level, evil is a tragic rejection of the demands
of love.(1) Moral good, on the other hand, is born of love, shows
itself as love and is directed towards love. All this is particularly
evident to Christians, who know that their membership in the one
mystical Body of Christ sets them in a particular relationship not
only with the Lord but also with their brothers and sisters. The
inner logic of Christian love, which in the Gospel is the living
source of moral goodness, leads even to the love of one's enemies:
"If your enemy is hungry, feed him; if he is thirsty, give
him something to drink" (Rom 12:20).
The "grammar" of the universal moral law
3. If we look to the present state of the world, we cannot help
but note the disturbing spread of various social and political manifestations
of evil: from social disorders to anarchy and war, from injustice
to acts of violence and killing. To steer a path between the conflicting
claims of good and evil, the human family urgently needs to preserve
and esteem that common patrimony of moral values bestowed by God
himself. For this reason, Saint Paul encourages all those determined
to overcome evil with good to be noble and disinterested in fostering
generosity and peace (cf. Rom 12:17-21).
Ten years ago, in addressing the General Assembly of the United
Nations about the need for common commitment to the service of peace,
I made reference to the "grammar" of the universal moral
law,(2) to which the Church appeals in her various pronouncements
in this area. By inspiring common values and principles, this law
unites human beings, despite their different cultures, and is itself
unchanging: "it subsists under the flux of ideas and customs
and supports their progress... Even when it is rejected in its very
principles, it cannot be destroyed or removed from the heart of
man. It always rises again in the life of individuals and societies".(3)
4. This common grammar of the moral law requires ever greater commitment
and responsibility in ensuring that the life of individuals and
of peoples is respected and advanced. In this light, the evils of
a social and political nature which afflict the world, particularly
those provoked by outbreaks of violence, are to be vigorously condemned.
I think immediately of the beloved continent of Africa, where conflicts
which have already claimed millions of victims are still continuing.
Or the dangerous situation of Palestine, the Land of Jesus, where
the fabric of mutual understanding, torn by a conflict which is
fed daily by acts of violence and reprisal, cannot yet be mended
in justice and truth. And what of the troubling phenomenon of terrorist
violence, which appears to be driving the whole world towards a
future of fear and anguish? Finally, how can we not think with profound
regret of the drama unfolding in Iraq, which has given rise to tragic
situations of uncertainty and insecurity for all?
To attain the good of peace there must be a clear and conscious
acknowledgment that violence is an unacceptable evil and that it
never solves problems. "Violence is a lie, for it goes against
the truth of our faith, the truth of our humanity. Violence destroys
what it claims to defend: the dignity, the life,
the freedom of human beings".(4) What is needed is a great
effort to form consciences and to educate the younger generation
to goodness by upholding that integral and fraternal humanism which
the Church proclaims and promotes. This is the foundation for a
social, economic and political order respectful of the dignity,
freedom and fundamental rights of each person.
The good of peace and the common good
5. Fostering peace by overcoming evil with good requires careful
reflection on the common good(5) and on its social and political
implications. When the common good is promoted at every level, peace
is promoted. Can an individual find complete fulfilment without
taking account of his social nature, that is, his being "with"
and "for" others? The common good closely concerns him.
It closely concerns every expression of his social nature: the family,
groups, associations, cities, regions, states, the community of
peoples and nations. Each person, in some way, is called to work
for the common good, constantly looking out for the good of others
as if it were his own. This responsibility belongs in a particular
way to political authorities at every level, since they are called
to create that sum of social conditions which permit and foster
in human beings the integral development of their person.(6)
The common good therefore demands respect for and the integral
promotion of the person and his fundamental rights, as well as respect
for and the promotion of the rights of nations on the universal
plane. In this regard, the Second Vatican Council observed that
"the increasingly close interdependence gradually encompassing
the entire world is leading to an increasingly universal common
good... and this involves rights and duties with respect to the
whole human race. Every social group must take account of the needs
and legitimate aspirations of other groups and the common good of
the entire human family".(7) The good of humanity as a whole,
including future generations, calls for true international cooperation,
to which every nation must offer its contribution.(8)
Certain reductive visions of humanity tend to present the common
good as a purely socio-economic state of well-being lacking any
transcendent purpose, thus emptying it of its deepest meaning. Yet
the common good has a transcendent dimension, for God is the ultimate
end of all his creatures.(9) Christians know that Jesus has shed
full light on how the true common good of humanity is to be achieved.
History journeys towards Christ and in him finds its culmination:
because of Christ, through Christ and for Christ, every human reality
can be led to complete fulfilment in God.
The good of peace and the use of the world's goods
6. Since the good of peace is closely linked to the development
of all peoples, the ethical requirements for the use of the earth's
goods must always be taken into account. The Second Vatican Council
rightly recalled that "God intended the earth and all it contains
for the use of everyone and of all peoples; so that the good things
of creation should be available equally to all, with justice as
guide and charity in attendance".(10)
As a member of the human family, each person becomes as it were
a citizen of the world, with consequent duties and rights, since
all human beings are united by a common origin and the same supreme
destiny. By the mere fact of being conceived, a child is entitled
to rights and deserving of care and attention; and someone has the
duty to provide these. The condemnation of racism, the protection
of minors, the provision of aid to displaced persons and refugees,
and the mobilization of international solidarity towards all the
needy are nothing other than consistent applications of the principle
of world citizenship.
7. The good of peace should be seen today as closely related to
the new goods derived from progress in science and technology. These
too, in application of the principle of the universal destination
of the earth's goods, need to be put at the service of humanity's
basic needs. Appropriate initiatives on the international level
can give full practical implementation to the principle of the universal
destination of goods by guaranteeing to all — individuals
and nations — the basic conditions for sharing in development.
This becomes possible once the barriers and monopolies that marginalize
many peoples are removed.(11)
The good of peace will be better ensured if the international community
takes on greater responsibility for what are commonly called public
goods. These are goods which all citizens automatically enjoy, without
having consciously chosen them or contributed to them in any way.
Such is the case, for example, at the national level, with such
goods as the judiciary system, the defence system and the network
of highways and railways. In our world the phenomenon of increased
globalization means that more and more public goods are taking on
a global character, and as a result common interests are daily increasing.
We need but think of the fight against poverty, the promotion of
peace and security, concern for climate change and disease control.
The international community needs to respond to these interests
with a broader network of juridical accords aimed at regulating
the use of public goods and inspired by universal principles of
fairness and solidarity.
8. The principle of the universal destination of goods can also
make possible a more effective approach to the challenge of poverty,
particularly when we consider the extreme poverty in which millions
of people are still living. The international community, at the
beginning of the new millennium, set the priority of halving their
number by the year 2015. The Church supports and encourages this
commitment and invites all who believe in Christ to show, practically
and in every sector, a preferential love for the poor.(12)
The tragedy of poverty remains closely linked to the issue of the
foreign debt of poor countries. Despite significant progress in
this area, the problem has not yet been adequately resolved. Fifteen
years ago I called public attention to the fact that the foreign
debt of poor countries "is closely related to a series of other
problems such as foreign investment, the proper functioning of the
major international organizations, the price of raw materials and
so forth".(13) Recent moves in favour of debt reduction, centred
mainly on the needs of the poor, have certainly improved the quality
of economic growth. Yet, because of a number of factors, this growth
is still quantitatively insufficient, especially in relation to
the millennium goals. Poor countries remain trapped in a vicious
circle: low income and weak growth limit savings and, in turn, weak
investments and an inefficient use of savings do not favour growth.
9. As Pope Paul VI stated and as I myself have reaffirmed, the
only really effective means of enabling States to deal with the
grave problem of poverty is to provide them with the necessary resources
through foreign financial aid — public and private —
granted under reasonable conditions, within the framework of international
commercial relations regulated with fairness.(14) What is urgently
needed is a moral and economic mobilization, one which respects
agreements already made in favour of poor countries, and is at the
same time prepared to review those agreements which have proved
excessively burdensome for some countries. In this regard, new impulse
should be given to Public Aid for Development, and new forms of
financing for development should be explored, whatever the difficulties
entailed.(15) Some governments are already looking carefully at
promising mechanisms for this; these significant initiatives should
be carried out in a spirit of authentic sharing, with respect for
the principle of subsidiarity. The management of financial resources
destined to the development of poor countries should also entail
scrupulous adherence, on the part of both donors and recipients,
to sound administrative practices. The Church encourages and contributes
to these efforts. One need only mention the significant contribution
made by the many Catholic agencies dedicated to aid and development.
10. At the end of the Great Jubilee of the year 2000, in my Apostolic
Letter Novo Millennio Ineunte, I spoke of the urgent need for a
new creativity in charity,(16) in order to spread the Gospel of
hope in the world. This need is clearly seen when we consider the
many difficult problems standing in the way of development in Africa:
numerous armed conflicts, pandemic diseases aggravated by extreme
poverty, and political instability leading to widespread insecurity.
These are tragic situations which call for a radically new direction
for Africa: there is a need to create new forms of solidarity, at
bilateral and multilateral levels, through a more decisive commitment
on the part of all, with complete conviction that the well-being
of the peoples of Africa is an indispensable condition for the attainment
of the universal common good.
May the peoples of Africa become the protagonists of their own
future and their own cultural, civil, social and economic development!
May Africa cease to be a mere recipient of aid, and become a responsible
agent of convinced and productive sharing! Achieving this goal calls
for a new political culture, especially in the area of international
cooperation. Once again I wish to state that failure to honour the
repeated promises of Public Aid for Development, the still unresolved
question of the heavy foreign debt of African countries and the
failure to give those countries special consideration in international
commercial relations, represent grave obstacles to peace which urgently
need to be addressed and resolved. Today more than ever, a decisive
condition for bringing peace to the world is an acknowledgement
of the interdependence between wealthy and poor countries, such
that "development either becomes shared in common by every
part of the world or it undergoes a process of regression even in
zones marked by constant progress".(17)
The universality of evil and Christian hope
11. Faced with the many tragic situations present in the world,
Christians confess with humble trust that God alone can enable individuals
and peoples to overcome evil and achieve good. By his death and
resurrection, Christ has redeemed us and ransomed us "with
a price" (1 Cor 6:20; 7:23), gaining salvation for all. With
his help, everyone can defeat evil with good.
Based on the certainty that evil will not prevail, Christians nourish
an invincible hope which sustains their efforts to promote justice
and peace. Despite the personal and social sins which mark all human
activity, hope constantly gives new impulse to the commitment to
justice and peace, as well as firm confidence in the possibility
of building a better world.
Although the "mystery of iniquity" (2 Th 2:7) is present
and active in the world, we must not forget that redeemed humanity
is capable of resisting it. Each believer, created in the image
of God and redeemed by Christ, "who in a certain way has united
himself to each human being",(18) can cooperate in the triumph
of good. The work of "the Spirit of the Lord fills the earth"
(cf. Wis 1:7). Christians, especially the lay faithful, "should
not, then, hide their hope in the depth of their hearts, but rather
express it through the structures of their secular lives in continual
conversion and in wrestling ‘against the world rulers of this
darkness, against the spiritual forces of iniquity' (Eph 6:12)".(19)
12. No man or woman of good will can renounce the struggle to overcome
evil with good. This fight can be fought effectively only with the
weapons of love. When good overcomes evil, love prevails and where
love prevails, there peace prevails. This is the teaching of the
Gospel, restated by the Second Vatican Council: "the fundamental
law of human perfection, and consequently of the transformation
of the world, is the new commandment of love".(20)
The same is true in the social and political spheres. In this regard,
Pope LeoXIII wrote that those charged with preserving peace in relations
between peoples should foster in themselves and kindle in others
"charity, the mistress and queen of all the virtues".(21)
Christians must be convinced witnesses of this truth. They should
show by their lives that love is the only force capable of bringing
fulfilment to persons and societies, the only force ca- pable of
directing the course of history in the way of goodness and peace.
During this year dedicated to the Eucharist, may the sons and daughters
of the Church find in the supreme sacrament of love the wellspring
of all communion: communion with Jesus the Redeemer and, in him,
with every human being. By Christ's death and resurrection, made
sacramentally present in each Eucharistic celebration, we are saved
from evil and enabled to do good. Through the new life which Christ
has bestowed on us, we can recognize one another as brothers and
sisters, despite every difference of language, nationality and culture.
In a word, by sharing in the one bread and the one cup, we come
to realize that we are "God's family" and that together
we can make our own effective contribution to building a world based
on the values of justice, freedom and peace.
From the Vatican, 8 December 2004.
JOHN PAUL II
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTES
(1) In this regard, Saint Augustine observed that "two loves
have established two cities: love of self, carried to contempt for
God, has given rise to the earthly city; love of God, carried to
contempt for self, has given rise to the heavenly city" (De
Civitate Dei, XIV:28).
(2) Cf. Address to the General Assembly of the United Nations for
its Fiftieth Anniversary (5 October 1995), 3: Insegnamenti XVIII/2
(1995), 732.
(3) Catechism of the Catholic Church, No. 1958.
(4) John Paul II, Homily at Drogheda, Ireland (29 September 1979),
9: AAS 71 (1979), 1081.
(5) The common good is widely understood to be "the sum of
those conditions of social life which enable groups and individuals
to achieve their fulfilment more completely and readily". Second
Vatican Ecumenical Council, Pastoral Constitution Gaudium et Spes,
26.
(6) Cf. John XXIII, Encyclical Letter Mater et Magistra: AAS 53
(1961), 417.
(7) Pastoral Constitution Gaudium et Spes, 26.
(8) Cf. John XXIII, Encyclical Letter Mater et Magistra: AAS 53
(1961), 421.
(9) Cf. John Paul II, Encyclical Letter Centesimus Annus, 41: AAS
83 (1991), 844.
(10) Pastoral Constitution Gaudium et Spes, 69.
(11) Cf. John Paul II, Encyclical Letter Centesimus Annus, 35:
AAS 83 (1991), 837.
(12) Cf. John Paul II, Encyclical Letter Sollicitudo Rei Socialis,
42: AAS 80 (1988), 572.
(13) Address to Participants in the Study Week of the Pontifical
Academy of Sciences (27 October 1989), 6: Insegnamenti XII/2 (1989),
1050.
(14) Cf. Paul VI, Encyclical Letter Populorum Progressio, 56-61:
AAS 59 (1967), 285-287; John Paul II, Encyclical Letter Sollicitudo
Rei Socialis, 33-34: AAS 80 (1988), 557-560.
(15) Cf. John Paul II, Message to the President of the Pontifical
Council for Justice and Peace: L'Osservatore Romano, 10 July 2004,
p. 5.
(16) Cf. No. 50: AAS 93 (2001), 303.
(17) John Paul II, Encyclical Letter Sollicitudo Rei Socialis,
17: AAS 80 (1988) 532.
(18) Second Vatican Ecumenical Council, Pastoral Constitution Gaudium
et Spes, 22.
(19) Second Vatican Ecumenical Council, Dogmatic Constitution Lumen
Gentium, 35.
(20) Pastoral Constitution Gaudium et Spes, 38.
(21) Encyclical Letter Rerum Novarum: Acta Leonis XIII 11 (1892),
143; cf. Benedict XV, Encyclical Letter Pacem Dei: AAS 12 (1920),
215.
Copyright © Libreria Editrice Vaticana
|